Instead of using your collection .Count() > 0, use .Any()<!-- --> | <!-- -->Patrick Desjardins Blog
Patrick Desjardins Blog
Patrick Desjardins picture from a conference

Instead of using your collection .Count() > 0, use .Any()

Posted on: March 23, 2012

If you are using a collection : ICollection, IList, List, which doesn't use enumerator to navigate, the fastest way to check if the collection contain anything is to use .Length or .Count.

But, if you are using IEnumerator<> which contain GetEnumerator() and MoveNext() the fastest way is to use .Any(). The reason is that Any() will do 1 loop and find that it has information so stop looping. If the collection is 10 of size or 9000 of size, both will do 1 loop so the speed is O(1).

LINQ-to-Objects implementation of Count() will call the .Count property for optimisation but if you have used LINQ with WHERE statement or any other Linq filter function, you will have an iterator-block based sequence and this Count() optimization won't be applied. In fact, it will loop all the collection to get the count. That mean that the performance is O(n).

countProperty 400x125

To keep it simple, for performance wise and maintenability wise, .Any is the best to use to know if something is inside a list.